The Effect of Electronic-Based Government Systems (SPBE) on Regional Tax Growth

Authors

  • Mela Nurdialy Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Aulia Hidayati Sekolah Vokasi IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33062/ajb.v11i01.204

Keywords:

SPBE, regional tax growth, fiscal capacity, digital governance, local government, Digital Government Transformation

Abstract

Indonesian local governments are mandated to enhance public service quality and strengthen regional fiscal capacity through digital government transformation. This study examines the impact of the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) implementation on regional tax growth among Indonesian provincial governments. A quantitative, explanatory research design was utilized, drawing on secondary data from the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform, the Directorate General of Fiscal Balance, Statistics Indonesia, and provincial government financial reports for the 2021–2024 period. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression using a pooled Ordinary Least Squares (pooled OLS) approach. The findings reveal that SPBE implementation does not significantly influence regional tax growth, as indicated by a negative coefficient of -0.0430 and a p-value of 0.1441. Conversely, regional fiscal independence, measured by the PAD Ratio, demonstrates a positive and significant effect on regional tax growth. These results suggest that digital government transformation has not directly improved regional fiscal capacity. The study suggests that digital government transformation alone may not be sufficient to strengthen regional fiscal performance without stronger institutional readiness and effective fiscal administration.

References

Decree of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2024 Concerning the Results of the Evaluation of the Electronic-Based Government System in Central Government Institutions and Regional Governments, Pub. L. 13, Kementrian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia (2024).

Decree of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 108 of 2023 Concerning the Results of the Monitoring & Evaluation of the Electronic-Based Government System in Central and Regional Government Institution, 1 (2023). https://jdih.esdm.go.id/common/dokumen-external/INDEKS_SPBE_Kepmen_Nomor_108_Tahun_2023_Tentang_Hasil_Tauval_Tahun.pdf

Decree of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 663 of 2024 Concerning the Results of the Evaluation of the Electronic-Based Government System in Central and Regional Government Institutions in 2024, 1 (2024). https://s.mkri.id/microsite/documents/wbkwbbm_1747036395_5eb9f4e6f21ee0e955af.pdf

Decree of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1503 of 2021 Concerning the Results of the Evaluation of the Electronic-Based Government System in Ministries, Agencies, and Regional Governments in 2021, 1 (2021). https://data.acehsingkilkab.go.id/dataset/43227fa5-788b-48a9-82e1-3147c35316c2/resource/a44da4dc-0551-4fd6-b233-283c8d706071/download/indeks-spbe-tahun-2021_compressed-1.pdf

Dias, G. P. (2020). Determinants of e-government implementation at the local level: an empirical model. Online Information Review, 44(7), 1307–1326. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2020-0148

Dimaggio, J. P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 143–166.

Directorate General of Fiscal Balance. (2024). Data Pendapatan Pajak Daerah dan Realisasi Anggaran Pemerintah Provinsi untuk Tahun 2021–2024.

Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Regulation No. 59 of 2020, 1 (2020). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/150381/permen-pan-rb-no-59-tahun-2020

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97–112.

Oates, W. E. (2008). On the evolution of fiscal federalism: Theory and institutions. National Tax Journal, 61(2).

Okunogbe, O., & Santoro, F. (2022). The Promise and Limitations of Information Technology for Tax Mobilization. http://www.worldbank.org/prwp.

Scott, W. R. (2014). (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Statistics Indonesia. (2024). Statistik Fiskal dan Ekonomi Pemerintah Provinsi. Badan Statistik Indonesia.

Zhang, Q., & She, J. (2024). Digital transformation and corporate tax avoidance: An analysis based on multiple perspectives and mechanisms. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0310241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310241

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles